WordPress - Web publishing software
Copyright 2011 by the contributors
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
This program incorporates work covered by the following copyright and
b2 is (c) 2001, 2002 Michel Valdrighi - email@example.com -
Wherever third party code has been used, credit has been given in the code's
b2 is released under the GPL
WordPress - Web publishing software
Copyright 2003-2010 by the contributors
WordPress is released under the GPL
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA
Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
The licenses for most software are designed to take away your
freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public
License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free
software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This
General Public License applies to most of the Free Software
Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to
using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by
the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to
your programs, too.
When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it
if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it
in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.
To protect your rights, we need to make restrictions that forbid
anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights.
These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you
distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.
For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that
you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the
source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their
We protect your rights with two steps: (1) copyright the software, and
(2) offer you this license which gives you legal permission to copy,
distribute and/or modify the software.
Also, for each author's protection and ours, we want to make certain
that everyone understands that there is no warranty for this free
software. If the software is modified by someone else and passed on, we
want its recipients to know that what they have is not the original, so
that any problems introduced by others will not reflect on the original
Finally, any free program is threatened constantly by software
patents. We wish to avoid the danger that redistributors of a free
program will individually obtain patent licenses, in effect making the
program proprietary. To prevent this, we have made it clear that any
patent must be licensed for everyone's free use or not licensed at all.
The precise terms and conditions for copying, distribution and
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
0. This License applies to any program or other work which contains
a notice placed by the copyright holder saying it may be distributed
under the terms of this General Public License. The "Program", below,
refers to any such program or work, and a "work based on the Program"
means either the Program or any derivative work under copyright law:
that is to say, a work containing the Program or a portion of it,
either verbatim or with modifications and/or translated into another
language. (Hereinafter, translation is included without limitation in
the term "modification".) Each licensee is addressed as "you".
Activities other than copying, distribution and modification are not
covered by this License; they are outside its scope. The act of
running the Program is not restricted, and the output from the Program
is covered only if its contents constitute a work based on the
Program (independent of having been made by running the Program).
Whether that is true depends on what the Program does.
March 29, 2010
Lucernex expert and President Joe Valeri (see Joe’s management summary here) discusses how integrated sales prediction modeling improves an a Store Lifecycle Management (SLM) solution.
In my last Blog I discussed use of Lease Analysis integrated into Store Lifecycle Management to provide the cost side of an ROI prediction tool. Cost is only half the data needed however, an accurate and trusted prediction of sales is equally important.
Sales prediction modeling is a tool used by real estate organization with multiple revenue producing sites whether it is direct sales, cell phone contracts, walk-in patients, investment clients, or tuition payments. In all cases a picture of “the customer” must be produced, usually based on past location results or a client defined picture of their customer.
Building these prediction models is an art and requires a sophisticated statistician as well as knowledge of the industry and available data. There are a number of companies that specialize in producing these models and some, like the market leader Buxton, have software tools that include their models providing a visual, usually map-based, view of market opportunities. Many clients also have analysts inside their walls to build and maintain their models. In-house models, like cost estimation models, are very often built in MS Excel and then loaded into some mapping technology like Streets and Trips for use by a few users with seta licenses for that software. In-house models, while likely accurate at some moment in time, generally do not take advantage of the most up to date data and rarely utilize the most up to date technology for disseminating the results of the model.
To come up with a trustworthy and accurate ROI Prediction for any site you need to have an accurate sales prediction model. The quality and accuracy of the model comes from years of experience building models for companies in retail, restaurant, hospitality, healthcare or whatever specific sector your company is in. There are few companies who are capable of providing a really meaningful and accurate picture of “the customer”. However when you invest in developing a model that fits your organization you should make the most use of it. Most real estate organizations will use the sales prediction model and, using a combination of tools usually involving MS Excel, compare the sales prediction per site to estimated cost to figure out the ROI or IRR for that site. This process is rarely real-time, usually involves multiple steps and is often open to error through human keying and re-keying.
As far as I know there is no real estate software solution on the market that has both a time-tested cost projection tool and an accurate sales prediction model fully integrated into it in a real-time manner. If it does exist it is likely custom built for the customer (which means expensive).
Having a real time ROI on every site under consideration would allow for quick, effective decision making on site acquisition and would allow those negotiating leases to see the real-time impact of a change in lease terms on the site ROI. This would give any company a strong advantage in good or bad economic times and, if used over the long term, should substantially increases overall location profitability.
My last Blog discussed how Lucernex had labored to overcome the common problems associated with simply integrating desktop MS Excel based financial models for lease cost analysis and sales prediction.
Having solved the cost side of the equation with Lx LseMod online, we set our sights on overcoming the sales prediction side. Last year we announced a partnership with Buxton, the premier predictive modeling firm in retail, restaurant, hospitality, healthcare and government.
One of the most important goals of this relationship was to bring the technology containing predictive models inside the Lx Retail Store Lifecycle Management Solution allowing Lucernex to provide a real-time ROI prediction tool for every site under consideration. In its first version, the ROI predictor will focus on leased properties followed quickly by an ROI predictor for owned properties.
Previous IWMS related Blogs
What is IWMS anyway?
IWMS? It’s Location! Location! Location!
The Power of Location Management
IWMS – Why so expensive?