 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lucernex Real Estate Software &#187; lease analysis software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/tag/lease-analysis-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lucernex.com/files</link>
	<description>Software solutions for real estate management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:20:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Probability in New FASB Lease Accounting Explained</title>
		<link>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/probability-new-fasb-lease-accounting?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=probability-new-fasb-lease-accounting</link>
		<comments>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/probability-new-fasb-lease-accounting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duport</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate lease analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FASB accounting rules changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FASB Lease Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease analysis software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New FASB rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new GAAP Accounting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucernex.com/files/?p=4352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucernex real estate finance expert Jim Duport (see Jim&#8217;s management summary here), after completing an upgrade to our core financial engine to support the new proposed FASB / GAAP rules, discusses how probability used to be used with the new FASB rules. This is the second in a series of Blogs by Jim describing his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucernex real estate finance expert Jim Duport <a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/company/management-team/jim-duport/"> (see Jim&#8217;s management summary here)</a>, after completing an upgrade to our core financial engine to support the new proposed FASB / GAAP rules, discusses how probability used to be used with the new FASB rules.</p>
<p><em>This is the second in a series of Blogs by Jim describing his findings during the process of developing the architecture within the core Lucernex financial engine to handle the new proposed FASB rules.</em></p>
<p>In my previous life I was a math major (actually also a high school math teacher), but, more importantly, I have a friend who is a PhD in Math. I figured if I didn’t understand the probability in the multiple examples I have seen of the new PROPOSED FASB Lease Accounting, then others might also be having issues understanding it.<span id="more-4352"></span></p>
<p><strong>For example:</strong> Assume ABC Company has a lease that has a non-cancellable 10-year term, an option to renew for 5 years at the end of 10 years and another option to renew for an additional 5 years at the end of the 15 years. Assume ABC Co. determines the probability for each term as follows:</p>
<p>a)	40% probability of a 10-year term<br />
b)	30% probability of a 15-year term<br />
c)	30% probability of a 20-year term</p>
<p>The term will be at least 10 years. There is a 60% chance that the term will be 15 years or longer, but only a 30% change that the term will be 20 years. So, there is a 60% chance that the term will be 15 years, which is the longest possible term more likely than not to occur. So, the “term” to use for calculating the “Rent / Right-to-Use” under the proposed new FASB GAAP accounting is 15 years.</p>
<p>Ugh! That doesn’t make sense to me initially, 40% + 30% = 70% (math 101).<br />
BTW: Statements a, b, &#038; c are the standard way I have seen probability presented (more below in another approach).</p>
<form style="border:1px solid #ccc;padding:3px;text-align:center;" action="http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify" method="post" target="popupwindow" onsubmit="window.open('http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=LxLPMFeed', 'popupwindow', 'scrollbars=yes,width=550,height=520');return true">
<p><font color="red" size="3"><b>Enter your email address to Subscribe to Lucernex Blogs:</b></font></p>
<input type="text" style="width:140px" name="email"/>
<input type="hidden" value="LxLPMFeed" name="uri"/>
<input type="hidden" name="loc" value="en_US"/>
<input type="submit" value="Subscribe" /></form>
<p>First things first – notice the TOTAL probability adds up to 1, or 100% (40% + 30% + 30%). In probability, the total of all possible outcomes must be 1. In other words, taking into account ALL actions, the total must = 1 since there are no other actions possible. Make sense so far?</p>
<p>Now, let’s see I can explain the 60% in layman’s terms. Let’s assume that ABC Co. is a bank with 100 branch offices all with identical leases, i.e. 10-year term with two 5-year renewal options.</p>
<ul>
<li>Year 1 – leasing 100 branches</li>
<li>End of Year 10 – “40% probability of ONLY a 10-year term” (added in ONLY). This means 40 branches close, and 60 are still open and exercise their renewal (as drafted in the initial lease). So a 60% (100% &#8211; 40%) chance the term will be at least 15 years since 60 offices are still open.</li>
<li>End of Year 15 – “30% probability of ONLY a 15-year term”. We had 100 branches when we started, 70 are now closed (40 in Year 10, an additional 30 in year 15); so now there is only a 30% chance the office will be extended to a 20-year term (100% &#8211; 40% &#8211; 30%). </li>
</ul>
<p><em>Make sense?</em></p>
<p>Summarizing (Assuming no “issues” (i.e. the company went bankrupt or did a restructuring):</p>
<ul>
<li>Year 1: 100 offices open. Conclusion: all 100 offices will be leased for 10 years, 100% probability.</li>
<li>End of Year 10: 60 offices open, 40 closed. Conclusion: 60 offices will be leased for 15 years; 60% probability.</li>
<li>End of Year 15: 30 offices open, 70 closed. Conclusion: 30 offices will be leased for 20 years; 30% probability</li>
<li>End of Year 20: I’m retired &#8211; NMP (Not My Problem)  ☺</li>
</ul>
<p>In terms of FASB, the conclusion is that more likely than not 60 offices will be leased for 15 years and this becomes the FASB 13 commitment.</p>
<p><strong>Another approach to explaining the probability:</strong><br />
<strong>For example: </strong>Assume ABC Company has a lease that has a non-cancellable 10-year term, an option to renew for 5 years at the end of 10 years and another option to renew for an additional 5 years at the end of the 15 years. Assume ABC Co. determines the probability for its occupancy ending with each lease term as follows:</p>
<p>a)	40% probability of its occupancy ending after a 10-year term<br />
b)	30% probability of its occupancy ending after a 15-year term<br />
c)	30% probability of its occupancy ending after a 20-year term</p>
<p>Notes: Added in “its occupancy ending” and remember we are only dealing with the renewal options in the lease; so, it is still possible ABC may negotiate a new renewal after 20 years.</p>
<p>We know the term will be at least 10 years and there is only a 40 % chance that ABC will vacate in the 10th year. Therefore, there is a 60% chance (100%-40%) that the 1st renewal will be exercised by ABC and the term will be 15 years, but only a 30% chance (100%-40%-30%) that the 2nd renewal will be exercised and the term will be longer than 15 years, in this case 20 years. Since a 30% probability of 20 years of occupancy is less than 50%, this term clearly is NOT “more likely than not” to occur. Accordingly, the more likely than not lease term for FASB purposes is considered 15 years.  Said differently; with a 60% chance that the occupancy term will be 15 years, from a simple math standpoint that is the longest possible term thought more likely than not to occur. So, the “term” to use for calculating the “Rent / Right-to-Use” under the proposed new FASB GAAP accounting is 15 years.</p>
<p>We are currently demo&#8217;ing the new financial engine as part of <a href="http://register.lucernex.com/web-demo/"> Lx LseMod Corporate v15</a>.</p>
<p>If you would like to see a sample New vs. Old report <a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/products/corporate-lease-analysis/new-fasb-gaap">click here</a> or you can <a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/lease-analysis-reports">download a complete report package</a> with multiple reports and schedules.</p>
<p>If you are interested in being a beta user on Lx LseMod Corporate version 15, please contact Jim by sending an email to <a href="mailto:sales@lucernex.com " title="LseMod 15 beta request">Lucernex Beta Request</a> with &#8220;LseMod 15 beta request&#8221; in the subject line.</p>
<p></p>
<h2>Shameless Plug</h2>
<p>The new Lucernex financial engine has been upgraded to support the new, proposed FASB rules.  This was a massive undertaking led by Jim Duport, our resident financial modeling expert, which, once complete, was verified at the formula level by an independent CPA.  The new engine will be released initially inside <a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/products/corporate-lease-analysis">Lx LseMod Corporate</a> version 15, to be released at the end of 2010.  We will then use the upgraded financial engine in our Q1 release of <a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/products/web-based-lease-administration">Lx Contracts</a>, our lease administration and rent accounting solution and as part of our Q1 release of the <a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/products/iwms/lx-iwms-modules/lease-analysis">Lease Analysis module</a> of <a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/products/iwms">Lx IWMS</a>.   Lx IWMS, Lx Contracts (which is sold alone or as part of the Lx IWMS suite) and the financial engine all share a single platform and single database.</p>
<p></p>
<h2>Past Blogs by Jim Duport</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/fasb-gaap-lease-accounting-changes/">Thoughts on the proposed FASB GAAP lease accounting changes</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/5-gaapsox-rules-you-need-to-know/">5 GAAP Rules you need to know</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/gaap-in-commercial-real-estate-sublease-accounting/">GAAP in Commercial Real Estate Sublease Accounting</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/go-beyond-a-simple-and-potentially-misleading-cash-flow-analysis/">Go Beyond a simple and potentially misleading Cash Flow analysis</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/what-is-gaap-rent-and-how-does-it-impact-sox/">What is GAAP rent and how does it impact SOX?</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/from-lucernex-real-estate-finance-expert-jim-duport/">Sale Leaseback transactions</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/fasb-lease-changes-lease-vs-buy/">The proposed FASB changes and the impact on the lease vs. buy decision</a><br />
<a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/when-new-fasb-gaap-is-cheaper/">When is the Proposed NEW FASB / GAAP Cheaper in Year 1 vs. Old GAAP?</a></p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/probability-new-fasb-lease-accounting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Valeri in NAR&#039;s RCA Report</title>
		<link>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/news/joe-valeri-in-nars-rca-report?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=joe-valeri-in-nars-rca-report</link>
		<comments>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/news/joe-valeri-in-nars-rca-report#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valeri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial real estate analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lease Administration software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease analysis software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucernex.com/files/?p=2125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucernex President Joe Valeri featured in NAR&#8217;s RCA Report The National Association of Realtors Winter 2010 edition of the RCA Report includes a front page article titled &#8220;Technology: Turning time into money&#8221;. The article discusses effective uses of technology for real estate professionals and features Lucernex President Joe Valeri and Lx LseMod.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td width="33%">
<a href="http://twitter.com/Lucernex" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.lucernex.com/files/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/twittericon-150x150.jpg" alt="Follow Lucernex on Twitter" title="Follow Lucernex on Twitter" width="18" height="18" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-2048" /></a>
</td>
<td width = "33%">
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/companies/64596" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.lucernex.com/files/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/linkedin_image.jpg" alt="Lucernex on LinkedIn" title="Lucernex on LinkedIn" width="18" height="18" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1827" /></a>
</td>
<td width = "33%">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LxLPMFeed/"><img src="http://www.lucernex.com/files/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/feedicon-150x150.jpg" alt="Subscribe to Lx Blog" title="Subscribe to Lx Blog" width="18" height="18" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-2060" /></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1>Lucernex President Joe Valeri featured in NAR&#8217;s RCA Report</h1>
<p>The National Association of Realtors Winter 2010 edition of the RCA Report includes a front page article titled <a href="http://www.realtor.org/wps/wcm/connect/8f176300416faf71ae0cbe08069f8e0c/rcareportwinter2010.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&#038;CACHEID=8f176300416faf71ae0cbe08069f8e0c">&#8220;Technology: Turning time into money&#8221;.</a>  The article discusses effective uses of technology for real estate professionals and features Lucernex President Joe Valeri and Lx LseMod.</p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/news/joe-valeri-in-nars-rca-report/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology: Turning time into money</title>
		<link>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/technology-turning-time-into-money?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=technology-turning-time-into-money</link>
		<comments>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/technology-turning-time-into-money#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Valeri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial real estate analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial real estate software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lease Administration software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease analysis software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate decision software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate leasing software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucernex.com/files/?p=2119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Originally published in the National Association of Realtors RCA Report, Winter 2010 If time is money, then technology is an investment a commercial real estate professional can scarcely afford to neglect. Today, brokers and property managers can produce complex analytical data, transfer the information to an easy-to-read Excel file and present it to clients with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td width="33%">
<a href="http://twitter.com/Lucernex" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.lucernex.com/files/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/twittericon-150x150.jpg" alt="Follow Lucernex on Twitter" title="Follow Lucernex on Twitter" width="18" height="18" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-2048" /></a>
</td>
<td width = "33%">
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/companies/64596" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.lucernex.com/files/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/linkedin_image.jpg" alt="Lucernex on LinkedIn" title="Lucernex on LinkedIn" width="18" height="18" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1827" /></a>
</td>
<td width = "33%">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/LxLPMFeed/"><img src="http://www.lucernex.com/files/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/feedicon-150x150.jpg" alt="Subscribe to Lx Blog" title="Subscribe to Lx Blog" width="18" height="18" class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-2060" /></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Originally published in the<a href="http://www.realtor.org/wps/wcm/connect/8f176300416faf71ae0cbe08069f8e0c/rcareportwinter2010.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&#038;CACHEID=8f176300416faf71ae0cbe08069f8e0c"> National Association of Realtors RCA Report, Winter 2010</a></p>
<p>If time is money, then technology is an investment a commercial real estate professional can scarcely afford to neglect.  Today, brokers and property managers can produce complex analytical data, transfer the information to an easy-to-read Excel file and present it to clients with a few key strokes. What used to be a laborious, mathematically-inclined and time-consuming process now has been so streamlined by software products that pencil pushing and number crunching are a much smaller part of the job.<br />
<span id="more-2119"></span><br />
Used correctly, technology allows professionals to significantly increase productivity. Of course, this comes with an investment of time and money by the broker or property manager. The benefits of more potential business and greater income usually offset the risk of the up-front investment.</p>
<p>Though it may be easier for larger firms to make the financial leap and allocate human capital, smaller firms may experience greater impact, some say. “We can make a smaller brokerage look bigger,” said Joe Valeri, president of Lucernex Technologies in Plano, Texas. “If you use it smartly, technology levels the playing field.”</p>
<p>Valeri began his real estate career in the IT division at Marriott, where he created and managed the hotel firm’s property development systems. Through his work, he developed software that streamlined the company’s methods of property acquisition and construction. Understanding this could be valuable for other businesses, he struck out in a career as a technology provider.</p>
<p>His firm supplies lease management, lease valuation and cash flow analysis tools, among others. While this software is important to anyone in the business, Valeri admits that some brokers may benefit more from these tools.</p>
<p>The costs can vary, but Valeri believes that a broker can remain competitive with the investment of $100-$200 dollars each month. &#8220;Brokers don&#8217;t have to be mathematical geniuses, but they still have to look professional, and providing reliable reports adds credibility,&#8221; said Valeri.</p>
<p>This is especially true in the investment sales arena.</p>
<p>Read the complete article <a href="http://www.realtor.org/wps/wcm/connect/8f176300416faf71ae0cbe08069f8e0c/rcareportwinter2010.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&#038;CACHEID=8f176300416faf71ae0cbe08069f8e0c"> here.</a></p>
<h2><em>Lx LseMod &#8211; the leading provider of Lease Analysis Software<em></h2>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/technology-turning-time-into-money/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go beyond a simple and potentially misleading Cash Flow analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/go-beyond-a-simple-and-potentially-misleading-cash-flow-analysis?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=go-beyond-a-simple-and-potentially-misleading-cash-flow-analysis</link>
		<comments>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/go-beyond-a-simple-and-potentially-misleading-cash-flow-analysis#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Duport</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cash flow vs P&L]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial lease software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lease analysis software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LseMod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P&L vs cash flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procalc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real estate software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucernex.com/files/?p=1584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lucernex expert Jim Duport (see Jim&#8217;s management summary here)describes the important of the P&#38;L statement and compares use of Cash flow analysis vs P&#38;L analysis. Intended for Corporate Real Estate Managers and Tenant Rep Brokers. Importance of P&#38;L? First and foremost, in a corporation the cost charged to a manager&#8217;s budget is the PreTax P&#38;L, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucernex expert Jim Duport <a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/company/management-team/jim-duport/"> (see Jim&#8217;s management summary here)</a>describes the important of the P&amp;L statement and compares use of Cash flow analysis vs P&amp;L analysis.</p>
<p><em>Intended for Corporate Real Estate Managers and Tenant Rep Brokers.</em></p>
<p></p>
<h1>Importance of P&amp;L?</h1>
<p>First and foremost, in a corporation the cost charged to a manager&#8217;s budget is the PreTax P&amp;L, not the Cash Flow. Since performance evaluations and bonuses are based on budgets, it is important to know how the impact of an action (e.g. leasing space) impacts the budget.</p>
<p>Profit &amp; Loss (P&amp;L) is what companies use when reporting financial results. A company&#8217;s P&amp;L is perhaps more important than its Cash Flow. It shows whether or not a business has achieved its primary objective &#8211; earning a profit.</p>
<p>You have probably heard people say, &#8220;Profitability is key.&#8221; Profitability is different from Cash Flow. Profitability is the number reported to Wall Street and quoted in newspapers in earnings per share (EPS).<br />
<span id="more-1584"></span><br />
Cash Flow represents the cash coming in (sales/revenues collected) less money actually spent (salaries, rent, costs of doing business, paying off money borrowed, etc.).</p>
<p>A company can be profitable, but have a negative cash flow. Alternatively, a company may be losing money on paper, yet have a positive cash flow.</p>
<p>Although it is rare, large real estate transactions can impact a company&#8217;s profitability, and what they have reported to Wall Street analysts, and ultimately, the stock price.</p>
<p>A company&#8217;s key financial metric can vary over time and in any particular fiscal year. The key metric can range from the Net Present Value of the AfterTax Cash Flow, to how much Capital is required in that year, to what is the PreTax P&amp;L impact in the current fiscal year.</p>
<p>Corporate managers are measured (and bonused) based on their P&amp;L performance. Typically this measurement does not include taxes, since corporations actually keep another set of books for paying taxes, thus the real measurement is the Pretax P&amp;L. It is important for a corporate real estate manager or an operating business unit manager to be sure the costs for an action being proposed or taken is within their budget, and their budget is a Pretax P&amp;L, not a Cash Flow.</p>
<form style="border:1px solid #ccc;padding:3px;text-align:center;" action="http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify" method="post" target="popupwindow" onsubmit="window.open('http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=LxLPMFeed', 'popupwindow', 'scrollbars=yes,width=550,height=520');return true">
<p><font color="red" size="3"><b>Enter your email address to Subscribe to Lucernex Blogs:</b></font></p>
<input type="text" style="width:140px" name="email"/>
<input type="hidden" value="LxLPMFeed" name="uri"/>
<input type="hidden" name="loc" value="en_US"/>
<input type="submit" value="Subscribe" /></form>
<p></p>
<h1>P&amp;L vs. Cash Flow</h1>
<p>In accounting for rent on a P&amp;L basis, companies have three choices &#8211; Cash Flow, Effective Rent, and GAAP Rent. Cash Flow rent uses whatever the actual cash paid for rent to generate the rent costs on the P&amp;L.</p>
<p>Effective rent takes the Base Rent and any rent abatement input (free rent), determines the average rent and uses that to generate the base rent costs on the P&amp;L. Rent increases are added to the effective rent to generate the rent shown on the P&amp;L.</p>
<p>GAAP rent takes the Base Rent, rent abatement and any increases (or decreases) and then determines the average rent and uses that number to generate the rent on the P&amp;L. The increases must be a known amount or a known percentage. For example, if rent goes up 3% annually, GAAP rent could be used; however, if rent goes up by the CPI (which is an unknown amount and can vary), GAAP rent should not be used.</p>
<p>Since taxes are based on the P&amp;L, one needs to account for the rent properly in order to calculate the taxes correctly, which is necessary to compare the true Net Present Value of the AfterTax Cash Flow.</p>
<p>Two additional key differences between P&amp;L and Cash Flow are Capital/Depreciation and Timing. Companies (and the IRS) categorize costs as Expense and Capital.</p>
<p>Capital is typically a one-time cost and if it has a useful life of more than one year it may be capitalized. Note that different companies have different rules about what is capitalized vs. being &#8220;expensed,&#8221; assuming a useful life of more than one year (furniture for example). Typically the break point is determined by the cost. The IRS rule is an asset is capitalized if the life of the asset is greater than one year and the cost is greater than $100. However, companies have agreements with the IRS that increase the $100 rule; in some cases as high as $25,000.</p>
<p>When a cost is Capitalized, the total cost is NOT shown in the first year in a P&amp;L analysis. Instead, the cost is depreciated and spread out over some period of time. Note that there are a number of ways to depreciate the costs such a straight-line, double declining balance, etc. The tax department in a company determines the approach, and the approach may be different between the Tax Return and what is reported to Wall Street as the P&amp;L. For simplicity and ease of understanding, using straight-line depreciation (that is dividing the cost by the number of months of its useful life) is typically best for corporate real estate financial analysis.</p>
<p>Timing is everything. The P&amp;L does not show Capital as a lump sum, but instead shows the cost as depreciation over some period of time. Assume you are spending $1 million to construct the interior improvements for a 10 year lease, thus the depreciation would be $100,000 per year ($1 million divided by 10 years).</p>
<p>In a Cash Flow analysis, the $1 million shows as a cost in the first year, but in a P&amp;L analysis, only the depreciation, the $100,000, shows as a cost in the first year. So, in comparing the Cash Flow to the P&amp;L analysis, the Cash Flow is $900,000 higher than the P&amp;L ($1 million less $100,000).</p>
<p></p>
<h1>Relationship Between P&amp;L and Cash Flow</h1>
<p>There are three fundamental parts to a companies financial reports &#8211; the P&amp;L, a Cash Flow statement, and the Balance Sheet, and they are all related.</p>
<p>Assume you sell a widget for $1,000 and your cost of selling the widget is $600. In a typical P&amp;L report, the $1,000 is recorded as a sale and $600 is a cost, leaving a profit of $400. This profit is shown as soon as the product is shipped, not when the bills are paid and the sales revenue collected.</p>
<p>In a simple transaction, the $1,000 is shown on the Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Statement as an Account Receivable and the $600 cost is shown as an Account Payable.</p>
<p>When the customer pays and the $600 cost is paid, the Cash Flow statement is updated to show the the additional $400 and the Balance Sheet is updated to show the $400 as cash and as retained earnings.</p>
<p>The key is timing &#8211; on the P&amp;L, the profit is shown as soon as the product is shipped. However, on the Cash Flow and Balance Sheet the net cash is not shown until all bills are paid and the customer has paid for the product.</p>
<form style="border:1px solid #ccc;padding:3px;text-align:center;" action="http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify" method="post" target="popupwindow" onsubmit="window.open('http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=LxLPMFeed', 'popupwindow', 'scrollbars=yes,width=550,height=520');return true">
<p><font color="red" size="3"><b>Enter your email address to Subscribe to Lucernex Blogs:</b></font></p>
<input type="text" style="width:140px" name="email"/>
<input type="hidden" value="LxLPMFeed" name="uri"/>
<input type="hidden" name="loc" value="en_US"/>
<input type="submit" value="Subscribe" /></form>
<p></p>
<h1>Special Considerations</h1>
<p>Taxes are based on the P&amp;L, not on Cash Flow. Consequently, you need to calculate the P&amp;L before you can calculate the taxes. And, to calculate the P&amp;L, you need to categorize costs as Expense or Capital, and then show the depreciation of the Capital costs in the P&amp;L calculation. The P&amp;L does not show Capital as a lump sum, but instead shows the cost as depreciation over some period of time.</p>
<p>When calculating P&amp;L, it is vitally important to measure the P&amp;L based on a company&#8217;s fiscal year for reporting financial results.</p>
<p>The fiscal year can be a calendar year, January through December, or it can start at any month in a year. For instance, most Japanese-owned companies have a fiscal year that starts in April and ends in March, while the federal government has a fiscal year that starts in October and ends in September.</p>
<p>Showing a P&amp;L analysis in Lease Years (Year 1, Year 2, etc.) can be extremely misleading. For instance, if a lease starts in October and a company has a calendar year fiscal year, then only three months of the P&amp;L costs will impact the first fiscal year, not twelve months if an analysis uses Lease Years.</p>
<p>For instance, in the earlier example of a $1 million capital expenditure depreciated over 10 years, on a P&amp;L basis only three months of depreciation would show in the first year, a $30,000 cost vs. a $100,000 cost in a Lease Year analysis.</p>
<p></p>
<h1>Financial Metrics</h1>
<p>The key financial metric in corporate real estate financial analysis depends on who is measuring and priorities. Usually when companies say that &#8220;Cash is King!&#8221; the key metric is capital.</p>
<p>Profitability is key. If profitability is the most important metric, then measuring and comparing the Pretax P&amp;L impact is most important. Sometimes the key is the first year P&amp;L impact, other times managers want to compare the P&amp;L by year.</p>
<p>It is important to note that other than retail, corporate real estate is a cost to a company and there is no profit unless space is purchased and later sold assuming appreciation of the asset. When space is leased, the cost goes right to the company&#8217;s bottom line. The theory is that the occupants of the building (staff, manufacturing, etc.) will generate a profit that will offset the cost of the real estate. Consequently, most P&amp;L and Cash Flow analyses for corporate real estate do not include any profit and just show the occupancy cost of the space.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lsemod.com/whybuy/pandlsample.html" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></p>
<p>In general, CFOs make comparisons based on the Net Present Value of the AfterTax Cash Flow. However, depending on priorities, they may also compare the P&amp;L impact and the capital required. Business unit managers who are charged back the cost of their space look for the Pretax P&amp;L impact in both the current fiscal year and over the term of the lease.</p>
<p></p>
<h1>The Bottom Line</h1>
<p>Companies have at least two bottom lines &#8211; the bottom line for P&amp;L (the number reported for profitability) and Cash Flow (the actual cost that represents money actually spent).</p>
<p>When doing a financial analysis, one needs to look at both numbers. Depending on a company&#8217;s priorities at that time, the P&amp;L can be more important than Cash Flow.</p>
<p>For individual managers, whether corporate real estate managers or the business unit manager, the Pretax P&amp;L represents the cost that is charged to their operating budget. The Pretax P&amp;L is the budget cost with which they are measured by management, and frequently a key measurement in their bonus plan.</p>
<p>So, help yourself and your customers by being sure to calculate the P&amp;L impact as well as the Cash Flow when comparing properties and doing your financial analyses.</p>
<h2>Shameless Plug</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/products/lx-lsemod/modules/lx-lease-analysis/">Lx LseMod Tenant Rep Lease Analysis</a> is the market leading application for lease analysis with easy to use input screens, powerful free emailing and full color client configurable reporting.  Brokers from all major houses including NAI, JLL, CBRE, Studley, GTZ, Cassidy Turley and many independent brokers user Lx LseMod Tenant Rep to win more business and wow their clients.</p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lucernex.com/files/index.php/blog/go-beyond-a-simple-and-potentially-misleading-cash-flow-analysis/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

